INTRODUCTION
The recent publication on Orthodoxy in Dialogue of an open letter on the topic of homosexuality (dated Nov. 8, 2017) by Dr David Ford of St Tikhon’s Orthodox Theological Seminary has elicited predictably strong-and-polarized emotional reactions from readers: some have expressed relief that the position they understand to be that of univocal Orthodox tradition is being rigorously defended by a person charged with teaching theology in an Orthodox institution; others, exasperation that the letter does not engage with the arguments and testimonies which have been made and given on many public platforms (including Orthodoxy in Dialogue itself) and therefore appears to refuse the genuine dialogue and radical self-critique (repentance) which is necessary for theological integrity.
This response is not an attempt to refute any of Dr Ford’s claims regarding homosexuality per se, because it seems to me that very many combatants in the arena of issues in sex, gender, and sexuality are committed to their declared positions on principle (this includes Dr Ford, whose many publications on this topic make his views quite clear), and so there is little to be gained from raising objections. Yet, the urgent contemporary questions raised in this area continue to challenge all of us in some way, and it seems that the apologies (more on this below) made by church spokespersons for the church’s views continue to fail to satisfy many who are deeply engaged with these issues in a variety of contexts—not least in the pastures of parish life. So, if public discourse on the topic of “same-sex attraction” (and other related matters) among Orthodox thinkers is to move beyond the impasse of an endless cycle of the assertion and re-assertion of mutually exclusive positions (which, all too often, devolves into a most unholy slanging match), I believe that we must enter upon a more difficult examination of the pillars on which the arguments that lead to our theological commitments stand. Read More




За эти пять с половиной минут, мы узнаем, что Герман бьет свою жену, когда он чувствует, что она этого заслужила. Со своей стороны, она написала книгу «Мужем Битая… Что Мне Пришлось Пережить с Германом Стерлиговым», в которой она защищает право мужа бить свою жену. (В интервью, под надзором мужа, она это называет „натуральным“.) Значение изображения на обложке не могло быть яснее: напротив дома в котором они живут со своими пятью детьми, с неявной поддержкой Церкви (судя по романтично-туманному фону) стоит Алена – руки по бокам — как мы, православные, стоим при молитве, без движения и с подчинением, секунды до того как копыта лошади Германа падают ей на голову.
Five weeks ago tomorrow, on January 22, we published our