VIDEO: THE FUTURE OF ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY IN UKRAINE by José Casanova, Shaun Casey, George E. Demacopoulos, Nadieszda Kizenko, and Aristotle Papanikolaou
SS. Volodymyr and Olha, Equals-to-the-Apostles, and the Baptism of Kyivan Rus’
This panel discussion was held on December 4, 2018 at Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs in Washington DC and co-sponsored with the Orthodox Christian Studies Center at Fordham University.
The Berkley Center describes the event as follows on its website:
In October of 2018, the Orthodox Church’s Istanbul-based leader, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, announced that he will grant autocephaly (independence) to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which has been under the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church. As religious tensions between the newly established Kiev Patriarchate and the Moscow Patriarchate develop, the future of the Orthodox Church remains uncertain. Panelists discussed the political, theological, historical, and geopolitical dimensions of these recent events in their commentary, as they assessed the current status and future opportunities for the church in Ukraine.
Orthodoxy in Dialogue is sharing this video in the interests of open debate on a topic of great importance to our readers around the world. Read More
Share this:
QUEER THEOLOGY: BEYOND APOLOGETICS reviewed by Jonathan Murden
Queer Theology: Beyond Apologetics
Linn Marie Tonstad
Eugene OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers/Cascade Books, 2018
Increasingly, Orthodox Christians—whether clergy, theologians, or ordinary faithful—are finding it necessary to engage in conversations about gender and sexuality. However, many of these conversations often seem distinctly lacking in depth. On the one hand, “traditionalists” will cite proof texts from the Scriptures or the Tradition without recognising the historical gap between contemporary relations and identities and those referred to in our historical texts. On the other hand, those critical of the existing status of LGBT+ people within the Church often have little more to say on the question than an affirmation of God’s loving embrace of all people, perhaps with scriptural or patristic proof texts of their own. Between either camp, there is often little attention paid to the distinct spiritual needs and contributions of sexual minorities in the Church.
In Queer Theology: Beyond Apologetics, Linn Marie Tonstad suggests that this failure of Christianity to really respond to LGBT+ people, both within and without the bounds of Christianity, may be a result of too great a focus on “apologetics,” that is, a narrow focus on justifying this or that stance on marriage or ordination (or occasionally, gender transition), rather than on what questions surrounding gender and sexuality might contribute to theology more broadly conceived. Tonstad runs quickly through a number of popular apologetic strategies in contemporary “queer theology,” including, for example, arguments from God as genderless, the potential corruption of Jesus’ message by the bigoted Paul, and idea of God’s love as intrinsically “transgressive.” Ultimately, Tonstad finds most of these arguments dissatisfactory, or at least uninspiring, but some—Tonstad especially notes “the nexus of arguments from food, circumcision, and judgement” (p. 47) in Paul—are worth spending more time with. Read More
Share this:
CREATED MALE AND FEMALE: TWO PROMINENT ORTHODOX SIGNATURES ON ANTI-TRANSGENDER LETTER
The following open letter appeared on the website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) on December 15, 2017. It contains two prominent Orthodox signatures: that of Archbishop Melchisedek (Pleska) of the Orthodox Church in America and of then Archimandrite, now Metropolitan Nathanael (Symeonides) of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. The letter came to Orthodoxy in Dialogue’s attention only this morning.
As was the case with the infamous Manhattan Declaration of November 2009, once again Orthodox spokesmen have made common cause with Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans, Muslims, Presbyterians, Southern Baptists, the Church of God in Christ, the Seymour Institute for Black Church and Policy Studies, the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, and the Bruderhof to produce a purely ideological statement lacking any of the theological nuance and pastoral spirit of Orthodox Christianity, any engagement with the evolving science of gender identity formation, any consultation with actual transgender or intersex people, or even any familiarity with the proper vocabulary used in the discussion of these questions.
Orthodoxy in Dialogue has an extensive Sexuality and Gender section in our Archives by Author. In particular we draw your attention to “Transgenderism” Isn’t a Thing, Intersex vs. Transgender, Why Sex Is Not Binary, and our own open letter of September 24, 2018, Sexuality & Gender: Open Letter to the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops of the United States of America. While our open letter elicited the predictable condemnations and guffaws of derision from the predictable blogs and websites, we beg our hierarchs, priests, deacons, monastics, theologians, and laity to read it carefully: human lives are at stake.
Archbishop Melchisedek and Metropolitan Nathanael
✠
Created Male and Female: An Open Letter from Religious Leaders
December 15, 2017
Dear Friends:
As leaders of various communities of faith throughout the United States, many of us came together in the past to affirm our commitment to marriage as the union of one man and one woman and as the foundation of society. We reiterate that natural marriage continues to be invaluable to American society. Read More
ORTHODOXY IN DIALOGUE 