AT THE CROSSROADS OF SCIENCE & MYSTICISM (At the Watersheds of Thought) reviewed by Giacomo Sanfilippo

At the Crossroads of Science & Mysticism: On the Cultural-Historical Place and Premises of the Christian World-Understanding
Pavel Florensky (Boris Jakim, trans. and ed.)
Kettering, OH: Semantron Press, 2014 

crossroads

It seems eminently appropriate to publish this review on the 86th anniversary of Father Pavel Florensky’s execution by firing squad in Soviet Russia. May his memory be eternal.

In the interest of full disclosure, it’s somewhat embarrassing to admit that, while I have known of At the Watersheds for ten years, and while the condensed English version At the Crossroads appeared in 2014, the latter  came to my attention only last week…and only (of all things) because Amazon recommended it as possibly relevant to other books I’ve purchased. If only Amazon had thought of this years ago! My reason for reviewing a book that’s nine years old is to introduce my readers to as much of Florensky’s thought as possible.

As my generalist readers around the planet and Florensky scholars everywhere are well aware, the chef d’œuvre for which Father Florensky is universally known is his monumental The Pillar and Ground of the Truth (hereinafter PGT), published in Moscow in 1914 and translated into English by Boris Jakim for publication in 1997. Subtitled An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters, Florensky conceived this weighty tome not so much in the usual sense of “theodicy,”  i.e., the problem of God vis-à-vis evil and suffering, as in a more expansive sense of “justifying God”—and, by extension, the Orthodox faith—to the mind of the modern skeptic typical of the Russian intelligentsia at the turn, and during the opening decades, of the last century. Each of his twelve “letters” addresses a topic of widespread interest to Russia’s educated classes, among them the Trinity, the antinomical character of Orthodox theology, universal salvation, sophiology, and male homosexuality. Read More


RUSSIA NAMES INTERNATIONAL LGBTQ MOVEMENT AS “EXTREMIST ORGANIZATION” by Alisa Orlova

The present report appeared at the Kyiv Post earlier today under an expanded title. Our readers should bear in mind the vaunted “Byzantine symphonia” model for church-state relations in 21st-century Russia: as goes the Kremlin, so goes the Patriarchate. Note the “accusations of ‘incitement of social and religious discord'” below [emphasis added].
Orthodoxy in Dialogue highly recommends the Kyiv Post for its extensive daily reporting on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and all other news Ukrainian. The previous paywall has been abolished under new ownership/management.

Russian Supreme Court Approves Labelling of 'International LGBT Movement' as Extremist Organization

Russia’s highest court has approved the Ministry of Justice’s request to ban and label the “International LGBT Movement” as an “extremist organization,” potentially allowing the government to confiscate donations dedicated to the representatives of the community and make its members  [sic] arrests.

The closed-door meeting on Thursday, Nov. 30, only permitted representatives from the Ministry of Justice to be present in the courtroom. Journalists were solely invited to hear the decision announcement, as reported by Mediazona’s correspondent. Read More


OPTIONS FOR GIVING TUESDAY AT ORTHODOXY IN DIALOGUE

givtue

Giving Tuesday is upon us once again, an annual opportunity for people around the planet to give whatever they’re able to worthy projects and initiatives of their choice.

Orthodoxy in Dialogue proposes the following three options to our readers, ranked by us in what we consider to be order of priority. You may choose to make a gift to one, two, or all three.

Read More


NEVER AGAIN IN 2023: A REPLY TO INGA LEONOVA by Christopher Iacovetti

Cold-in-Gaza

Cold in Gaza

Mohammed al-Hawajri
2015

Inga Leonova has written—and Public Orthodoxy has published—a genuinely bizarre article. Darkly titled “Strike the Jew,” Leonova’s essay comprises at least three incongruous elements: (1) valid observations about rising Western antisemitism and the Orthodox Church’s abiding complicity in it; (2) unfounded assertions about the events of October 7 and Israel’s genocidal response to them; and (3) apocalyptic pronouncements about the supposedly eternal, transhistorical, and ineradicable hold that anti-Jewish bigotry enjoys across the entire world. Responding to every issue raised in Leonova’s piece would require far more space than the present article allows for. Instead, I will offer a series of observations that help to disentangle the various issues that Leonova problematically—indeed, damagingly—attempts to sandwich together. Read More